A. Srinivasa Mudaliar v. V.S. Seeralan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 23.01.2020

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE G.K. ILANTHIRAIYAN S.A. No. 1001 of 2005

1. A.Srinivasa Mudaliar

2. Chittibabu ... Appellants/Defendants -Vs1. V.S.Seeralan

2. Saravanan

3. Kumaravel

4. Vijayakanth ... Respondents/Plaintiffs Prayer : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the decree and judgment dated 29.03.2005 made in A. S. No. 56 of 2002 on the file of the Sub Court, Kancheepuram reversing the decree and Judgment dated 16.06.2000 in O.S.No.1467/1994 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Kancheepuram.

For Appellants : Mr.K.S.Lakshmikumaran

J U D G M E N T

The learned counsel for the appellants submitted that though he had written letter to the appellants, he has got no instructions from the appellants. Therefore, he reported no instructions from his clients.

1/8 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Though notice has been sent through Court as well as through counsel, the appellants have not taken any steps to proceed with the case. This shows that the appellants have got no interest to proceed with the matter further. Therefore, this second appeal is dismissed as default. No costs. Sd/- Asst.Registrar (CS VI ) /true copy/ Sub Asst. Registrar kmm To

1. The Sub Court, Kancheepuram

2. The Principal District Munsif Court, Kancheepuram.

S.A. No. 1001 of 2005 gp(co) aa17/03/2020 2/8 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/