← Library
Madras High CourtWP/3975/2007dismissed

L.Selvi, W/O.Late P.Lakshmi v. The Director Collector

2022-03-01Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 01.03.2022

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S.RAMESH W.P.No.3975 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 L.Selvi

...Petitioner

-Vs1. The District Collector,

2. The Project Officer, Sainathapuram,

3. The Block Development Officer, Sholingur, Wallajah Taluk,

4. The Block Supervisor, Sholingur, Wallajah Taluk, 5.Mr.R.Gandhi, M.L.A.

6.Mrs.Ramani ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the entire records connected with the impugned order of the 2nd respondent passed in Se.Mu.Na.Ka.1533/A/2006 dated 19.01.2007 and quash the same and further direct the respondents 1 and 2 to appoint the writ petitioner as the Anganwadi Worker in C.N.Pattadai Anganwadi

Center in Sholinghur, Vellore District.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Sathia Chandran For R1 : Mr.E.Veda Bagath Singh, Special Government Pleader For R2 to R6 : No Appearance

ORDER

The petitioner herein was appointed on 05.01.2007 by the second respondent as an Anganwadi Worker. Through the impugned order dated 19.01.2007, her appointment was cancelled, on the ground that she was not a resident of the village in which the post was called for. In her place, another person was appointed on 19.01.2007.

2. One of the essential requirements for appointment to the post of Anganwadi Worker is that the incumbent should be a native of the village in which the post is called for. When it was found that the petitioner did not belong to that village, there is no infirmity in the order of the second respondent, cancelling her appointment and appointing somebody else in that place. Even otherwise, the sixth respondent, who was appointed in the place of the petitioner, has been serving in the post for the past 15 years and as such, it would not be appropriate to disturb her appointment, after a long passage of time.

3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar hvk To

1. The District Collector,

2. The Project Officer, Sainathapuram,

3. The Block Development Officer, Sholingur, Wallajah Taluk,

4. The Block Supervisor, Sholingur, Wallajah Taluk, +1cc to Mr.V.K.Rajagopalan, Advocate, S.R.No.13612 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.14184 W.P.No.3975 of 2007 and M.P.No.1 of 2007 PMK(CO) CT 11/03/2022