Settu@Raj v. State Rep. By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Monday, the Seventh day of February Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R. PONGIAPPAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.2587 of 2022 1 SETTU @ RAJ [ PETITIONERS / ACCUSED ] 2 BALAJI 3 VEERABATHIRAN Vs STATE REP. BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J8-NEELANKARAI POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

(CRIME.NO.36/2022) For Petitioner : R.SASIKUMAR Advocate For Respondent : MR. S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- This petition has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Crime No.36 of 2022 for the alleged offences under Sections 465, 467, 468, 420 and 34 of IPC.

2.The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) would submit that till now, the petitioners herein are not arrayed as accused in this case and it is not necessary to grant anticipatory bail at this stage. 3.Recording the above submission made by the learned Additional Government Advocate (Crl.Side), this Criminal Original Petition is closed.

-sd/- 07/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

TO 1 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J8-NEELANKARAI POLICE STATION, CHENNAI.

2 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

+1 CC to M/S.R.SASIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR.NO.2075 CRL OP.2587/2022 Date :07/02/2022 INBA~10/02/2022 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/