← Library
Madras High CourtWP/4395/2025disposed of

K.Senthil Kumar v. The District Revenue Officer

2025-02-13Honourable Mr Justice N. Anand Venkatesh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 13.02.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE N. ANAND VENKATESH W.P.No.4395 of 2025 K.Senthil Kumar ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the DRO, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District.

2.The Assistant Commissioner, Land Reforms, Villupuram, Villupuram Taluk and District.

3.V.Ramya 4.D.Vaithiyalingam 5.Kumar @ Konda Reddiyar 6.Yogammal ... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the 1st respondent to pass order on the petitioner's Review Application dated 06.11.2024, preferred against the order in 1/4

R.C. No.19425 of 2012 / L2 dated 01.04.2024 on the file of the 1st respondent and dispose the same within a time frame that may be fixed by this Court. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arokiamaniraj For Respondents : Mr.A.Selvendran Special Government Pleader for R1 and R2

O R D E R

This writ petition has been filed for issue of writ of mandamus directing the 1st respondent to pass orders on the Review Application filed by the petitioner on 06.11.2024, within the time frame fixed by this Court. 2.Heard Mr.S.Arokiamaniraj, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Mr.A.Selvendran, learned Special Government Pleader appearing on behalf of respondents 1 & 2.

3.The 1st respondent has passed the order dated 01.04.2024 and the petitioner is seeking for the review of the order by making a representation dated 06.11.2024. The learned counsel for the petitioner is not able to show any 2/4

provision which confers such power of review on the 1st respondent. The power of appeal or review is not an inherent power and it has to be conferred by a statute. Therefore, in the absence of any such power, the 1st respondent cannot exercise the power of review. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant the relief as sought for in this writ petition. However, it goes without saying that it is left open to the petitioner to question the order passed by the 1st respondent dated 01.04.2024, in the manner known to law.

4.This writ petition is disposed of in the above terms. No Costs. 13.02.2025 Internet : Yes Index : Yes Speaking Order / Non Speaking Order ssr To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Office of the DRO, Chengalpattu, Chengalpattu District.

3/4

N. ANAND VENKATESH, J.

ssr 2.The Assistant Commissioner, Land Reforms, Villupuram, Villupuram Taluk and District.

W.P.No.4395 of 2025 13.02.2025 4/4