M. Mani v. Mr. M. Gajendran

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 27.03.2019

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA Contempt Petition No.1057 of 2018 M.Mani, S/o.K.Marimuthu, No.65, Arumuga Iyar Street, Kannan Kurinchi Post, Salem 636 008.

... Petitioner Vs.

M.Gajendran, The Managing Director, Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Salem) Limited, 12, Ramakrishna Salai, Salem-636 007.

... Respondent This Contempt Petition is filed to punish the respondents for willfully and wantonly disobeying the order of this Court dated 22.04.2016 in W.P.No.14805 of 2016. For Petitioner : Mr.A.Nagarathinam For Respondent : Ms.S.Rajini Ramadoss, Standing Counsel

O R D E R

Alleging the violation of the orders of this Court made in W.P.No.14805/2016 dated 22.04.2016, the present contempt petition has been filed.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.

When the matter is taken up today, filing a Memo of Calculation, the learned Standing Counsel for the respondent submitted that the interest portion on the gratuity has become the subject matter of the contempt petition. Since the petitioner reached the age of superannuation and retired w.e.f. 30.06.2014, by applying the extended period of 30 days, the respondent is liable to pay interest only from 01.08.2014. Accordingly, it was calculated and paid to the petitioner. The commutation was also rightly calculated and entire amount has been paid. 3.

Therefore, when the memo of calculation has been filed stating that entire amount has been fully paid, nothing survives in the Contempt Petition. Recording the same, the Contempt Petition is closed SD/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR(COMM.CASES) tsi //Certified to be true copy// Dated at Madras this the day of 2019. COURT OFFICER(O.S.) from 25th day of September 2008 the Registry is issuing Certified copies of the Orders/Judgments/Decrees in this format.

Sm/06/05/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/