M.Subramanian v. District Revenue Officer

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 14.08.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM W.P.No.22122 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2008 1.M.Subramanian 2.K.Samiappan 3.R.Jayakumar 4.P.Sivanathan 5.K.Saradha 6.S.Pappathi alias Palaniammal 7.Palanichamy 8.V.Janaki 9.C.Kavitha 10.K.Ramasamy 11.V.Dharmaraj 12.M.Kumarasamy 13.V.Selvamani ... Petitioners Vs.

1.District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

2.Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur, Coimbatore District.

3.Tahsildar, Tiruppur Taluk, Tiruppur, Coimbatore District.

4.Visalakshi 5.M.Valli Meiappan Respondents 4 and 5 Rep.by their Power of Attorneys i) K.Loganathan ii)S.Thangaraj ... Respondents

Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the orders of the 1st and 2nd respondents (i) dated 30.6.2008 in proceedings R.P.No.8 of 2006 E2 and (ii) dated 25.4.2006 in proceedings Na.Ka.No.3729/2005 A2, respectively, directing the 3rd respondent herein to enter the names of the 4th and 5th respondent herein in the Taluk and Village Revenue records in respect of 2.44 acres of land in S.F.No.370/1 of Veerapandi Village and quashing the same and consequently directing the respondents herein to enter the names of the petitioners herein in the Taluk and Village Revenue records in respect of their lands in S.F.No.370/1 of Veerapandi Village.

For Petitioners : Mr.K.Elango For Respondents : Mr.D.Suriyanarayanan Additional Government Pleader for R1 to R3 No appearance for R4 & R5

O R D E R

Heard Mr.K.Elango, learned counsel for the petitioners, Mr.D.Suriyanarayanan, learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 3 and perused the materials available on record.

2. This writ petition has been filed challenging the order of the first respondent dated 30.06.2008, in and by which, confirming the order of the second respondent dated 25.4.2006, whereby, a direction was given to third respondent to enter the name of the respondents 4 and 5 in the revenue records in respect of the lands in S.No.370/1 of Veerapandi Village measuring an extent of 2.44 acres.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the dispute between the writ petitioners and the contesting respondents 4 and 5 have been amicably settled and the entire extent of property in dispute was sub divided into 15 plots and sold to the third parties. A memo dated 14.8.2019 to that effect has been filed.

4. In the light of the above facts and the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, this Court is of the considered opinion that no further adjudication is required in this writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ms To 1.The District Revenue Officer, Coimbatore District, Coimbatore.

2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Tiruppur, Coimbatore District.

3.The Tahsildar, Tiruppur Taluk, Tiruppur, Coimbatore District.

+1cc to Mr.K.Elango, Advocate Sr.69266 +1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.69786 W.P.No.22122 of 2008 and M.P.Nos.1 and 2 of 2008 rgn[co] srg 10/01/2019