Raghu v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.05.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.VIMALA CRL.O.P.No.11859 of 2015 1.Raghu 2.Venkatesan ... Petitioners vs.

1. State : Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District.

2. State : Inspector of Police, B1, Dharmapuri Police Station, Dharmapuri Town & District. ... Respondents Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioners. For Petitioners :

Mr.M.Karuppiah For Respondent :

Mr.P.Govindarajan Additional Public Prosecutor

O R D E R

The petitioners seek a direction to the respondents not to harass the petitioners.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

3. There is an undertaking on the side of the respondent police that if the presence of the petitioners are required by the respondent police, they will issue summons to them and as otherwise, they will not cause any inconvenience to them.

4. Recording the undertaking on the side of the respondent police, the petitioners are directed to appear before the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

respondent police for interrogation and enquiry, if they receive any summons. In such event, the petitioners shall not be harassed by the respondents.

With the above observation, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS V) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Ga/Rj To

1. The Superintendent of Police, Dharmapuri District.

2. The Inspector of Police, B1, Dharmapuri Police Station, Dharmapuri Town & District.

+1cc to Mr.M.Karuppiah, Advocate, S.R.No.24947 CRL.O.P.No.11859 of 2015 VD(CO) CA(12/05/2015) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/