Madras High CourtSA/1276/2005dismissed for default

Anantharaman v. Harikrishnan

2019-09-09Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 09.09.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM S.A.No.1276 of 2005

1. Anantharaman

2. Ramadoss

3. Sakunthala ... Appellants/Plaintiff 2 to 4 Vs.

1. Harikrishnan

2. Kannan ... Respondents 1 & 2 Defendants 1 & 3

3. Vasantha

4. Raju

5. Shanthi

6. Tamilarasan

7. Suganthi (5th respondent set exparte.

Given up. No notice is necessary) ... Respondents PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment of the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram made in A.S.No.21 of 2002 (A.S.No.47/97 Sub Court, Vridhachalam) dated 27.01.2005, confirming the decree and judgment of the Court of the Principal District Munsif, Vridhachalam made in O.S.No.1230 of 1985 dated 28.04.1997. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondents : M/s.Srinath Sridevan for R2 to R4, R6 and R7 : R5 Given up : R1 died

JUDGMENT

In the last hearing i.e., on 06.09.2019, the learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that he has handed over the bundle to the appellants. Hence, the Registry was directed to remove his name in the cause-list and print the name of the appellants in the cause-list. Accordingly, the name of the appellants printed in the cause-list, but, the appellants not https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

appeared either in person or through counsel. The appellants called absent. The learned counsel for the respondents present. Hence, the second appeal is dismissed for default. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar (Insp Cell) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vv To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Chidambaram.

2. The Principal District Munsif, Vridhachalam.

3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No.1276 of 2005 PA(CO) GN(14/10/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/