Perumal v. Nattan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 30.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A. No.1290 of 2005 Perumal ...Appellant Vs Nattan

...Respondent

PRAYER: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 C.P.C. against the Judgement and Decree of the Additional Subordinate Judge's Court at Vridhachalam, dated 22.03.2005 in A.S.No.42 of 2004 reversing the Judgment and Decree of the Principal District Munsif Court at Vridhachalam dated 10.12.2003 in O.S.No.979 of 1992. For Appellant : No appearance

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal" today. There is no representation on the side of the Appellant. On the last hearing date i.e., on 22.06.2021, learned counsel for the Appellant was present and steps have also not been taken to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole respondent. It can now be inferred that the Appellant is not interested in prosecuting this second appeal. Accordingly, this Second Appeal shall stand dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.

s/d- Assistant Registrar True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar nl To

1. The Additional Subordinate Judge's Court at Vridhachalam

2. The Principal District Munsif Court at Vridhachalam https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Copy to The Section Officer VR Section High Court, Madras 104.

S.A. No.1290 of 2005 UM(CO) SP(26/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/