Madras High CourtWP/44568/2006dismissed for nonprosecution

Dr.Mrs.S.Sridevi v. The Metropolitan

2019-10-25Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated: 25..10..2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN Writ Petition Nos.44568 & 44569 of 2006 and M.P.Nos.2 of 2006 W.P.No.44568 of 2006 Dr. Mrs.Sridevi ... Petitioner -Versus1.The Metropolitan Magistrate, Room No.62, Patiala House Court, (Criminal-I), New Delhi.

2.M/s.Kohli Graphic Systems Private Limited, 808, Naurang House, 21, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi 110 001.

3.M/s.Kohli Graphic Systems Private Limited, A-1, Second Floor, Parsn Paradise, 109, G.N.Chetty Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017. ... Respondents Prayer in W.P. No.44568 of 2006:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings in C.C.No.1376 of 2006 on the file fo the 1st respondent initiated by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same. W.P.No.44569 of 2006:

G.Dayanandan ... Petitioner -Versus1.The Metropolitan Magistrate, Room No.62, Patiala House Court, (Criminal-I), New Delhi.

2.M/s.Kothi Graphic Systems Private Limited, 808, Naurang House, 21, Kasturba Gandhi Marg, New Delhi 110 001.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3.M/s.Kohli Graphic Systems Private Limited, A-1, Second Floor, Parsn Paradise, 109, G.N.Chetty Road, T.Nagar, Chennai 600 017.

... Respondents Prayer in W.P. No.44569 of 2006:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the proceedings in C.C.No.1377 of 2006 on the file fo the 1st respondent initiated by the 2nd respondent and to quash the same. For Petitioner : No Appearance for petitioner in both WPs For Respondent(s) : No Appearance for R1 in both WPs Mr.K.P.Sanjeev Kumar for R2 and R3 in both WPs COMMON ORDER When these writ petitions came up on 24.10.2019 for hearing, there was no representation for the petitioner in both the writ petitions and hence, this court had directed the matters to be posted today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner in both the writ petitions.

It appears that the petitioner in both the writ petitions are not interested in prosecuting the matter further. Thus, the writ petitions are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected MPs are closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Writ Petition Nos.44568 & 44569 of 2006 pm[co] srg 03/12/2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.