D.Ammani, v. The District Collector,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATE: 10-08-2016

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN Writ Petition No.8357 of 2014 D.Ammani .. Petitioner Vs 1.The District Collector Coimbatore District Coimbatore.

2.The Revenue Divisional Office Revenue Division Office Coimbatore Coelenterate Coimbatore - 18.

3.The Director Airport Authority of India Chennai.

4.The Director Airport Authority of India Coimbatore.

... Respondents Prayer : Petition is filed seeking for a Writ of Mandamus, directing the fourth respondent to disburse the pending lease arrears amount for the years 2010 to 2013 of the land in S.F.No.501/2 to the extent of 36 4/7 cents aat Kalapatti and Singanallur Vilage under the Sub Registrar's office, Kalapatti Village, Coimbatore District.

For Petitioner : M/s.C.D.Johnson For Respondents No.1 & 2 : Mr.P. Kaarthikeyan

Govt. Advocate For Respondents No.3 & 4 : Mr.C.K. Appaji CGSC

O R D E R

Heard.

2. This writ petition has been filed, praying that this Court may be pleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, directing the fourth respondent to disburse the pending lease arrears amount for the period, from 2010 to 2013, in respect of the the lands in S.F.No.501/2, having an extent of 36 4/7 cents, at Kalapatti and Singanallur Villages.

3. At this stage of the hearing of the writ petition, the learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the third and the fourth respondents had placed before this Court, a copy of the 'Statement of Lease Rent Calculation', dated 7.1.2015, stating that the payment of the total lease rent amount had already been made, for the period, from 01.04.2009 to 31.12.2014, in respect of the lands, taken on lease, in Kalapatti and Singanallur Villages.

4. The learned counsel, appearing on behalf of the first and the second respondents herein, had submitted that the second respondent would disburse of the amounts due to the land owners concerned, on the

production of the relevant documents, by the petitioners, showing that they are the owners of the lands in question, within a period of twelve weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

5. The above submission of the learned counsel, appearing for the first and the second respondents is hereby recorded. In view of the above submissions of the learned counsels appearing on behalf of the respondents 1 to 4, this Court is of the view that no further orders are necessary, in the present writ petition. Hence, the writ petition is closed. No costs.

Index:Yes/No 10.08.2016 Internet:Yes/No rnb Note to office:

Issue Order copy on 19.8.2016

M.JAICHANDREN,J.

rnb Writ Petition No.8357 of 2014 10-08-2016