Commissioner, v. N.Radhakrishnan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 30.04.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A.No.1328 of 2005 and C.M.P.No.17743 of 2005 Commissioner, Panchayat Union, Annagramam.

...

Appellant/ Defendant

Versus

1. N.Radhakrishnan

2. N.Mohan ...

Respondents/Plaintiff Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of CPC against the Judgment and Decree dated 13.07.2004 in A.S.No.33 of 2003 on the file of the Sub-Court, Panruti reversing the Judgment and Decree dated 27.08.2003 in O.S.No.378 of 1996 on the file of District Munsif Court, Panruti.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.R.Gururaj

JUDGMENT

The matter is listed under the caption "for dismissal", today. Even on the last occasion i.e. on 23.04.2021, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. However, the learned counsel for the respondents is present. Therefore, it can now be inferred that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the Second Appeal. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vsi2 To

1. The Subordinate Judge,Panruti.

2.The District Munsif,Panruti.

Copy to:

The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court,Madras. S.A.No.1328 of 2005 and C.M.P.No.17743 of 2005 sv(CO) A.SK(09.07.2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/