Kumar v. Dhanasekaran

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 20.02.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAVINDRAN S.A.No.1354 of 2005 Kumar ...Appellant Vs.

1. Dhanasekaran

2. Srinivasan

3. Narayanan

...Respondents

Prayer:

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 15.07.2004 passed in A.S.No.10 of 2004 on the file of the court of the subordinate judge, Chidambaram allowing the same and setting aside the decree and judgment dated 21.11.2003 made in O.S.No.124 of 1996 on the file of the District Munsif cum judicial Magistrate, Parangipetti.

For Appellant : No apperance.

For Respondents : Mr.A.Muthukumar

JUDGMENT

This matter was listed on 19.02.2019 and on that day, there was no representation for the appellant despite the matter being called twice. Accordingly, Registry was directed to list the matter under the caption "for dismissal" on 20.02.2019.

2. Today, when the matter is called, counsel for the respondents present and there is no representation for the appellant. Appellant called. Absent.

3. Resultantly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution with costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition, if any, is closed.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

MEMORANDUM OF COSTS Respondent Costs Rs.P.

Stamp for Vakalatnama ...

...

10.00 Advocate's fee on rupees (FC Not received) ...

Translation Printing Charges ...

...

Nil -------- Typing ----------------- (Rupees Ten Only) 10.00 ----------------- To be paid to the Respondent by the petitioner as cost incurred Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CCC) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar bga To 1.Subordinate Court, Chidambaram.

2.District Munsif cum Judicial Magistrate Court, Parangipetti.

3.The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.A.Muthukumar, Advocate, S.R.No.15322 S.A.No.1354 of 2005 PP(CO) RRS(19/07/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/