Madras High CourtSA/1356/2005dismissed as abated

A.Vinogiya,W/O.Edward v. Indirani Ammal

2019-09-27Honourable Mr Justice P. Rajamanickam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 27.09.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.RAJAMANICKAM S.A.No. 1356 of 2005 1.A.Vinogiya 2.A.Vimala ... Appellants Vs.

Indirani Ammal ... Respondent PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the judgment and decree of the VI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai, dated 01.07.2003 in A.S.No.6 of 2003, confirming the judgment and decree of the XVI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai, dated 30.11.2001 in O.S.No.2935 of 1997, inter-alia.

For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Mr. A.Ragupathy Raj

JUDGMENT

In the last hearing i.e, on 18.09.2019, there was no representation for the appellants. The learned counsel for the respondent filed a memo stating that the sole respondent died on 07.03.2015 and the list of the LRs also mentioned in the said memo. Hence, the matter has been posted today for taking steps to implead the LRs of the sole respondent. Today also, no representation for the appellants.

2. Since already the limitation for taking steps to implead the LRs expired, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is also closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

dna To 1.The VI Additional City Civil Court, Chennai. 2.The XVI Assistant City Civil Court, Chennai. 3.The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to M/s.G.Jawaharlal, Advocate SR.83152 S.A.No. 1356 of 2005 BP(CO) CB(18/11/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/