Kaliyaperumal v. Arulmighu Thillai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 16-11-2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM Second Appeal No.1388 of 2005 Kaliyaperumal .. Appellant ..Vs..

Arulmighu Thillai Amman Koil, Chidambaram Represented by the Executive Officer .. Respondent Second Appeal is preferred under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.22 of 2004 on the file of the Sub Court, Chidambaram dated 13.9.2004, confirming the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.71 of 1988 dated 30.9.2003 on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Chidambaram.

For Appellant : No Appearance For Respondent : Mr.R.Sunil Kumar

J U D G M E N T

The Second Appeal was listed for hearing on 14.11.2018. None appeared for the appellant. Thus, the case was directed to be listed on 15.11.2018 under the caption "For Dismissal".

2. When the matter is taken up for hearing on 15.11.2018, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. In order to give one more opportunity to the appellant, once again the case was directed to be listed on 16.11.2018 under the caption "For Dismissal". When the matter is taken up for hearing on 16.11.2018, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Thus, it is to be construed that the appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Accordingly, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also dismissed. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar Svn To 1.Sub Court, Chidambaram.

2.Principal District Munsif Court, Chidambaram.

S.A.No.1388 of 2005 SAI(CO) SSM(07/12/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/