Devakodi v. State Rep By

CRL. O.P. NO.11004 of 2016 R.MAHADEVAN, J.

The petitioners apprehend arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 294 (b) & 506 (ii) of IPC in Crime No. not known of 2016 seek anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners and defacto complainant belong to the same village and there is a love affair between the defacto complainant and first petitioner, who is the son of petitioners 1 and 2. In this connection, dispute arose between the petitioners and defacto complainant, due to which, the petitioners are alleged to have indulged in a wordy quarrel with the defacto complainant and attacked him and inflicted injuries on him.

3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case.

4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submitted that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that the injured has already been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

(i) The petitioner shall, within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Ariyalur and shall executing a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the investigating officer;

(ii) For the purpose of interrogation, the petitioners shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation and (iii) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer.

19.05.2016 adl/msr