D.Senthil Kumar v. The Deputy Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.12.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.MAHADEVAN W.P.No.10102 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 D.Senthil Kumar ...

Petitioner Vs The Deputy Commissioner (Excise), Government of Puducherry, Puducherry.

... Respondent Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondent to issue necessary application forms to the petitioner to enable the petitioner to submit his request for license for IMFL FL-1 and FL-2 licenses as per G.O.Ms.No.1/Excise dated 22.02.2010. For Petitioner : Mr.T.V.Krishnamachari For Respondents : Mrs.G.Djearany Government Advocate (P)

ORDER

Today, when the matter is taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication. However, the learned counsel submitted that the petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the authority concerned for appropriate remedy.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2. Granting such liberty, the writ petition stands closed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VI) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar ms To The Deputy Commissioner (Excise), Government of Puducherry, Puducherry.

+1cc to Mr.T.V.Krishnamachari, Advocate, S.R.No.87128 +1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.87957 W.P.No.10102 of 2010 and M.P.No.1 of 2010 MR(CO) GSP(25/01/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/