Silambarasan v. The Station House Officer
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 08.12.2015
CORAM
The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE R.SUDHAKAR and The Honourable Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Habeas Corpus Petition No.3099 of 2015 Silambarasan .. Petitioner Vs.
1. The State represented by its Station House Officer, Vada Ponparappi Police Station, Villupuram District.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Villupuram.
3. Arumugam
4. Ramasamy
5. Meenatchi
6. Meenambal
7. Ambika .... Respondents PETITION under Section 226 of The Constitution of India praying for the issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus directing the first respondent to produce the person named Monisha, D/o, Rajamanikkam aged about 22 years, who is in the illegal custody of respondents 3 to 7 and their men before this Court and to give her custody to the petitioner.
For Petitioner : Mr.T.Arunkumar For Respondents: Mr.V.M.R.Rajendran Addl. Public Prosecutor (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
(Order of the Court was made by R.SUDHAKAR,J.) This Habeas Corpus Petition is filed by the brother of the detenue Monisha, for a direction to the respondents to produce the detenue before this Court and set her at liberty.
2. It is the case of the petitioner that his sister went missing on 21.10.2015, in connection with which, a case in Crime No.140 of 2015 has been registered by the respondent - police under Section 366 IPC. Inspite of registration of the case, respondent - police have not taken any steps to secure the detenue and hence the present petition.
3. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor, on instruction, submits that investigation is in progress in this case.
4. Admittedly, it is a case of family dispute. The petitioner states that the detenue is aged 22 years and betrothal was arranged for the detenue on 15.10.2015 and the marriage was scheduled to be held during January, 2016. The allegation of the petitioner is that the detenue ran away from home and respondents 3 to 7 are responsible for the same. From this it transpires that there is an allegation of love affair with the third respondent.
5. In such view of the matter, even according to the petitioner, the detenue being major and that she left the house on her own accord, it cannot be said that it is a case of illegal detention warranting issuance of Writ of Habeas Corpus. Accordingly, this Habeas Corpus Petition stands closed, with a direction to the respondent - police to proceed with the investigation in Crime No.140 of 2015 and keep the petitioner informed about the developments.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar sl
To
1. The Station House Officer, Vada Ponparappi Police Station, Villupuram District.
2. The Superintendent of Police, Villupuram District, Villupuram.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. + 1 cc to Mr.R.Kumaravel, Advocate SR.65810 H.C.P.No.3099 of 2015 CA(CO) Eu 4.01.16