D.Ravi v. The Inspector Of Police

CRL. O.P. NO.11015 of 2016 R.MAHADEVAN, J.

The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences under Sections 324, 441, 467, 468 and 506(ii) in Crime No. not known of 2016 seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on account of a property dispute between both sides, the petitioner is alleged to have attacked the defacto complainant and inflicted injuries on him. Hence the complaint. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that already a civil suit is pending between the parties and it is a case in counter.

4.Learned Additional Public Prosecution would submit that the injured has been discharged from the hospital.

5. Considering the above facts and circumstances of the case and also taking note of the fact that the injured has been discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

(i) The petitioner shall, within 15 days from the date of receipt of copy of the order, appear before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Tambaram and shall execute a bond for Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties for the like sum to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate or to the satisfaction of the investigating officer;

(ii) For the purpose of interrogation, the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation and (iii) The petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any Police Officer.

19.05.2016 adl/msr