Madras High CourtCRP/397/2019dismissed as infructuous

M/S.Uttam Roadways P Ltd v. Nagarajan

2021-06-29Honourable Mr Justice C.V. Karthikeyan4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 29.06.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.KARTHIKEYAN CRP [NPD] .Nos.397 & 441/2019 & CMP.No.2713/2019 in CRP.[NPD] No.397/2019 [Video Conferencing] M/s.Uttam Roadways P Ltd rep.by its Divisional Manager No.2/73 Venkata Maistry Street Mannady, Chennai.

Petitioner in both CRPs

Versus

Nagarajan ..

Respondent in both CRPs Prayer in CRP.No.397/2019:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India against the judgment and decree dated 13.11.2018 made in RCA No.126/2017 by the learned IX Small Causes Court, Chennai confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 27.01.2017 made in RCOP.No.2346/2013 by the learned X Small Causes Court, Chennai.

Prayer in CRP.No.441/2019:- Civil Revision Petition filed under Article

227 of the Constitution of India against the judgment and decree dated 13.11.2018 made in RCA No.262/2017 by the learned IX Small Causes Court, Chennai confirming the fair and decreetal order dated 27.01.2017 made in RCOP.No.1600/2014 by the learned X Small Causes Court, Chennai.

For Petitioner in both CRPs :

Mr.N.Mariappan For Respondent in both CRPs :

Mr.Dinesh Rajkumar COMMON ORDER (1) In both the revision petitions, parties are the same. The tenant is the revision petitioner.

(2) It is informed by Mr.Dinesh Rajkumar, learned counsel for the respondent/landlord that the tenant had vacated the petition premises and handed over vacant possession. It is his claim that nothing further survives in the revision petitions.

(3) The presence of Mr.M.Mariappan, learned counsel for the revision petitioner is also acknowledged.

(4) Both the Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed as infructuous. (5) It is also informed that the original documents have been filed in

RCOP.No.2346/2013, which was pending on the file of the learned Judge, X Small Causes Court, Chennai, pursuant to which, CRP [NPD] No.397/2019 has been filed.

(6) Learned counsel placed a request that the original documents may be returned.

(7) Such request can be placed before the concerned learned Judge, viz., learned Judge, X Small Causes Court, at Chennai and on substitution of copies of documents I am confident that the Rent Controller would accede to the return of the originals after following due procedure. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed. 29.06.2021 AP Internet : Yes To 1.The Judge, X Small Causes Court, Chennai.

2.The Judge, IX Small Causes Court, Chennai.

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J., AP

29.06.2021