Rajagopal Naidu v. Krishnamoorthy,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 24.08.2021

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE ABDUL QUDDHOSE S.A.NO.214 OF 2005 AND C.M.P.NO.3079 OF 2005 Rajagopal Naidu ...Appellant/Appellant/Plaintiff versus

1. Krishnamoorthy

2. Murugesan

...Respondents/Respondents/Defendants

Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code against the Judgment and Decree in A.S. No.29 of 2002 on the file of the Sub-ordinate Judge, Arni and dated 1.12.2004 in confirming judgment and decree in O.S. No.461 of 1995, on the file of the District Munsif Court, Polur and dated 19.03.2002. For Appellant : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan For Respondents : Mr.M.Sriram

JUDGMENT

There is no representation on the side of the appellant. The learned counsel for the respondents is present. On the last hearing date i.e., on 02.08.2021, it was made clear by this Court that if steps are not taken to bring on record the Legal Representatives of the deceased appellant before the next https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

hearing date, the Second Appeal shall stand automatically dismissed as abated. Till date, steps have not been taken to bring on record the Legal Representatives of the deceased appellant. Hence in accordance with the earlier order dated 02.08.2021, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) // True Copy // Sub Assistant Registrar vsi2 To

1. The Subordinate Judge, Arni.

2. The District Munsif, Polur.

Copy To The Section Officer, V.R.Section, High Court, Madras.

S.A.No.214 of 2005 GJ(CO) RLP(17/09/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/