Manikandan v. The State Rep.By

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN, J.

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offence punishable under Sections 465, 467, 468, 471 of IPC in Crime No. 7 of 2023, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. It is stated that the petitioner had submitted fraudulent certificates and joined the Agricultural Department on compassionate appointment. During regularisation, the fact of the fraudulent certificates were detected and the petitioner had been subsequently terminated from service.

3. It is stated that only the copy of the certificates had been seized by the respondent. The original must be handed over by the petitioner and if he does not have it, proper explanation must be given.

4. Taking all the factors into consideration, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

5. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready, before the Special Court for CBCID, Egmore, Chennai, on condition that the petitioner shall

execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, failing which, the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition that: [a] the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity. [b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., until further orders.

[c] the petitioner shall producethe original +2 mark sheet and certificate which has to be handed over to the investigating Officer and if the petitioner does not, then the respondent should immediately file application seeking cancellation of this order. [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial.

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

13.02.2024 vsg

C.V.KARTHIKEYAN , J.

vsg 13.02.2024