G.Latha, v. State By

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 06.05.2015

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.VIMALA CRL.O.P.No.11928 of 2015 G.Latha .. Petitioner vs.

State by Inspector of Police, ATC,CB CID, Chennai.

.. Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. praying to direct the respondent not to harass the petitioner by way of threatening.

For Petitioner :

Mr.S.V.Ramamurthy For Respondent :

Mr.P.Govindarajan Additional Public Prosecutor *****

O R D E R

The petitioner seeks a direction to the respondent not to harass her by way of threatening.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent.

3. There is an undertaking on the side of the respondent police that if the presence of the petitioner is required by the respondent police, they will issue summon to her and as otherwise, they will not cause any inconvenience to her.

4. Recording the undertaking given by the respondent police, the petitioner is directed to appear before the respondent police for interrogation and enquiry, if she receives any summon. At the same time, the petitioner shall not be harassed under the guise of investigation.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

With the above observation, the Criminal Original Petition is disposed of.

Ga/Rj Sd/- Vacation Officer //True Copy// Sub-Assistant Registrar To

1. The Inspector of Police, ATC,CB CID, Chennai.

2. The Public Prosecutor, Chennai.

+ 1 cc to Mr.S.V.Ramamurthy, Advocate SR 8232 ssi(co) prk11/5 CRL.O.P.No.11928 of 2015 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/