P.Mani, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.11.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR P.Mani ... Petitioner vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu by its Secretary to the Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.

2.The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

3.The Commercial Tax Officer, Perundurai Assessment Circle, Perundurai - 638 052.

Erode District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Declaration that Section 19(11) of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2006 is inconsistent, null and void. For Petitioner :

Mr.T.Sundar Rajan For Respondents :

Mr.Haja Nazirudeen, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.G.Nanmaran, Spl. Government Pleader (Taxes) Page Nos.1/4

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,] When the matter was taken up, Mr.T.Sundar Rajan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned 'Writ Petition' (hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity) saying that the matter has since been settled vide Samadhan Scheme. Saying so, learned counsel for writ petitioner has made an endorsement in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:

Page Nos.2/4

2. In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WP is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S.,J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 11.11.2024 Index : Yes / No mmi To 1.The Secretary to the Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.

2.The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

3.The Commercial Tax Officer, Perundurai Assessment Circle, Perundurai - 638 052.

Erode District.

Page Nos.3/4

M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., mmi 11.11.2024 Page Nos.4/4