← Library
Madras High CourtWP/1144/2010withdrawn dismissed

P.Mani, v. The State Of Tamil Nadu,

2024-11-11Honourable Mr Justice M. Sundar,Honourable Mr.Justice K.Rajasekar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 11.11.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.SUNDAR and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR and M.P. No.1 of 2010 in W.P. No.1144 of 2010 P.Mani ... Petitioner vs 1.The State of Tamil Nadu by its Secretary to the Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.

2.The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

3.The Commercial Tax Officer, Perundurai Assessment Circle, Perundurai - 638 052.

Erode District.

... Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of The Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the 3rd respondent in order dated 20.11.2009 in TIN : 33182921002/2008-2009 and quash the same and direct the 3rd respondent to assess the turnover relating to the period from 01.04.2008 to 17.06.2008 under Section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu value Page Nos.1/4

Added Tax Act, 2006 separately and assess the turnover relating to the period from 18.06.2008 to 31.03.2009 separately, under Section 3(4) (a) and (b) of the Act, for, the introduction of the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax (Second Amendment Ordinance 2008) is made effective from 18.06.2008.

For Petitioner :

Mr.T.Sundar Rajan For Respondents :

Mr.Haja Nazirudeen, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr.G.Nanmaran, Spl. Government Pleader (Taxes)

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.SUNDAR, J.,] When the matter was taken up, Mr.T.Sundar Rajan, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner sought leave of this Court to withdraw the captioned 'Writ Petition' (hereinafter 'WP' for the sake of brevity) and captioned 'Miscellaneous Petition' (hereinafter 'MP' for the sake of brevity) thereat saying that the matter has since been settled vide Samadhan Scheme. Saying so, learned counsel for writ petitioner has made an endorsement in the case file and a scanned reproduction of the same is as follows:

Page Nos.2/4

2. In the light of the narrative thus far, captioned WP is dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, captioned MP is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. (M.S.,J.) (K.R.S.,J.) 11.11.2024 Index : Yes / No mmi Page Nos.3/4

M.SUNDAR, J., and K.RAJASEKAR, J., mmi To 1.The Secretary to the Government, Commercial Taxes and Registration Department, Secretariat, Chennai - 9.

2.The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Ezhilagam, Chepauk, Chennai - 5.

3.The Commercial Tax Officer, Perundurai Assessment Circle, Perundurai - 638 052.

Erode District.

11.11.2024 Page Nos.4/4