← Library
Madras High CourtWP/22215/2004dismissed as infructuous

Venkatappa v. The Asst. Collector

2018-12-17Honourable Mr Justice S.M. Subramaniam2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :17.12.2018

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM W.P.No.22215 of 2004 Venkatappa .. Petitioner vs The Assistant Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District. .. Respondent Prayer:

Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, calling for the records relating to the impugned order passed by the respondent in Na.Ka.No.4214/2004 (B2) dated 25.06.2004 and quash the same.

For Petitioner :Mr.P. Sathish For Respondent : Mr.Akhil Akbar Ali, Govt Advocate

O R D E R

When the matter was taken up for consideration, the learned counsel appearing on both sides, on instructions, submitted that the relief sought for herein has become infructuous and hence, nothing survives for adjudication in the present writ petition. 2.Recording the said submission, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Pkn To The Assistant Collector, Hosur, Krishnagiri District.

+1 cc to The Government Pleader, SR.No.88362 W.P.No.22215 of 2004 CP(CO) CSL/11.01.2019 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/