R.Purushothaman v. The Commissioner

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.11.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR W.P.No.12085 of 2010 R.Purushothaman ...Petitioner Vs.

The Commissioner Thiruppur Corporation Thiruppur,ThiruppurDistrict ...Respondent Prayer: The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for records on the file of the respondent relating to the order issued in Na.Ka.No.C1/10656/2008 dated 23.01.2009 and quash the same and consequently direct the respondent to promote the petitioner to the post of Supervisor / Class IV Officer in Tiruppur Municipal Corporation Service in accordance with his original seniority with all consequential service on par with his justice and monetary benefits. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Ramesh For Respondent : Mr.G.Sankaran

O R D E R

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. He has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle. 2.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently connected miscellaneous petition if any also stands dismissed. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

kas To.

The Commissioner Thiruppur Corporation Thiruppur, Thiruppur District +1cc to M/s.G.Sankaran, Advocate SR.93126 W.P.No.12085 of 2010 RSI(CO) CB(13/12/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/