S.Murugesan v. Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 22.11.2024 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.M.SUBRAMANIAM AND THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.JOTHIRAMAN and W.M.P.No.3154 & 3161 of 2019 W.P.No.2893 of 2019 S.Murugesan ... Petitioner Vs.

Union of India, Represented by the Chairman, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001.

Union of India, Represented by the General Manager,

5.

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the orders passed by the 5th respondent in O.A.No.1353/2013 dated 06.10.2016 and the order of the third respondent issued in P(S)443/II/MACP/REP/Mr.SM dated 24.12.2012 and quash the same, with the consequential direction, directing the third respondent to grant II and III financial upgradation of grade Pay of Rs.4600 and Rs.4800 with effect from 01.09.2008, on par with the similarly placed candidates, as per the VI Pay Commission Recommendation on Modified Career Progression Scheme (MACP) with all consequential benefits including monetary benefits. For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Vijay Anand Standing Counsel for Railways [for R1 to R4] : R5-Tribunal W.P.No.2897 of 2019 D.Arjunan ... Petitioner Vs.

Union of India, Represented by the General Manager,

... Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for the issuance of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the orders passed by the 4th respondent in O.A.No.1550/2013 dated 06.10.2016 and the order of the third respondent issued in No.T/P/500/PG CELL dated 20.09.2012 and quash the same, with the consequential direction, directing the respondents to grant II Financial upgradation of Grade Pay of Rs.4,600 with effect from 01.09.2008, on par with the similarly placed candidates, as per the VI Pay Commission Recommendation on Modified Career Progression Scheme (MACP) with all consequential benefits including monetary benefits.

For Petitioner : No appearance For Respondents : Mr.M.Vijay Anand Standing Counsel for Railways [for R1 to R3] : R4-Tribunal

COMMON ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.) When the matters were listed on 20.11.2024, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Thus, today, the matters have been listed under the caption 'for dismissal'.

Even though sufficient opportunity was provided, none appeared for the petitioners. Therefore, both the Writ petitions stand dismissed for 'nonprosecution'. No order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.

[S.M.S., J.] [M.J.R., J.] 22.11.2024 Index: Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order veda

To The Chairman, Rail Bhavan, New Delhi - 110 001.

The General Manager, 5.

S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND M.JOTHIRAMAN, J.

veda 22.11.2024