R.Chinthamani v. The Union Of India Owning

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 20.11.2017 Coram THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.DURAISWAMY C.M.A.No.253 of 2015 R.Chinthamani ... Appellant vs.

The Union of India Owning Southern Railway Rep. by General Manager Chennai - 600 003 ... Respondent Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed under Section 23 of the Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 against the judgment dated 18.12.2014 made in O.A.(II U)121 of 2014 on the file of Railway Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench, Chennai. For Appellants : No appearance For Respondent : Ms.T.P.Savitha Standing Counsel

J U D G M E N T

Consistently there is no representation on behalf of the appellant.When the matter was listed for hearing on 30.10.2017, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant, hence, the matter was adjourned to 13.11.2017. On 13.11.2017 also, there was no representation for the appellant. Hence, the Registry was directed to list the matter on 20.11.2017 under the caption for dismissal. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. In these circumstances, this court left with no other option except to dismiss the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal for non prosecution. Accordingly, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal is dismissed for non prosecution No costs.

-s/d- Assistant Registrar(CCC) True Copy Sub-Assistant Registrar https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

Rj To

1. The Railway Claims Tribunal, Chennai Bench, Chennai.

+1 CC to Ms.T.P. Savitha, Advocate sr 82188.

C.M.A.No.253 of 2015 RR(CO) SP(13/12/2017) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/