Madras High CourtSA/931/2005dismissed for default

K. Rajasekar v. K. Jeyalakshmi

2020-02-04Honourable Mr Justice G.K. Ilanthiraiyan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 04.02.2020

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN S.A.No.931 of 2005 and C.M.P.No.12868 of 2005 K.Rajasekar ...Appellant/2nd Defendant Vs.

1.K.Jeyalakshmi 2.Shanmugam ...Respondents/Plaitiff and 1st Defendant PRAYER:

The Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of CPC against the judgment and decree dated 06.04.2005 and made in A.S.No.24 of 2004 on the file of the Subordinate Court Judge, Sankagiri and made in O.S.No.53 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sankagiri dated 30.10.2003.

For Appellant : T.R.Rajaraman For Respondents : Mr.N.Manokaran for R1 R2 - Not ready in Notice

JUDGMENT

The second appeal is directed as against the judgment and decree dated 06.04.2005 and made in A.S.No.24 of 2004 on the file of the Subordinate Court Judge, Sankagiri and made in O.S.No.53 of 1998 on the file of the District Munsif Court, Sankagiri dated 30.10.2003.

2. The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submitted no instructions on behalf of the appellant. Though several opportunities given to the appellant, there is no response from the appellant. It shows that the appellant have no interest to proceed with this appeal.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. Accordingly, the second appeal is dismissed for default. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition stands closed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Subordinate Judge, Sankagiri.

2.The District Munsif, Sankagiri.

Copy to The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.

+1cc to Mr.N.Manokaran, Advocate Sr.8833 S.A.No.931 of 2005 pa[co] srg 17/04/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/