Pricillal Rathnam v. The Superintendent Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 11.04.2018 C O R A M THE HONOURABLE Mr.JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.No.4461 of 2014 Pricillal Rathnam

...Petitioner

Vs.

The State rep by the Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District ... Respondent Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C to direct the respondents to register the F.I.R. on the complaint dated 24.01.2014 and investigate the matter in accordance with law.

For Petitioner : Mr.S.Arokiamaniraj For Respondent : M/s.P.Kritika Kamal, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

This criminal original petition has been filed to direct the Respondent to register the petitioner's complaint dated 24.01.2014.

2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent.

3. In view of the order passed by this Court in Sugesan Transport Pvt. Ltd., -Vs- The Assistant Commissioner of Police, J2, Adyar Police Station, Adyar, Chennai-600 020 and another [2016 (5) CTC 577 : 2016-2-LW (Crl.) 499], this petition is not maintainable.

https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

4. Hence, this petition is closed with liberty to the petitioner to work out her remedy in the manner set out in Sugesan (supra).

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(Audit) //True copy// Sub Assistant Registrar lok To 1.The Superintendent of Police, Office of Superintendent of Police, Tiruvallur, Tiruvallur District 2.The Public Prosecutor,High Court, Madras.

Crl.O.P.No.4461 of 2014 SSD(CO) GN(25/04/2018) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/