← Library
Madras High CourtWP/22443/2009dismissed as infructuous

D.Prakash v. The Block Development Officer

2019-06-06Honourable Mr Justice M.Dhandapani2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.06.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.22443 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 D.Prakash

...Petitioner

Vs.

1. The Block Development Officer, (Regular), Chengam Panchayat Union, Chengam, Thiruvannamalai District.

2. The President, Beemanandhal Panchayat, Beemanandhal, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

3. Karunamoorthy, Member, Ward No.11, Chengam Panchayat Union Council, Chengam Panchayat Union, Chengam, Thiruvannamalai District. ... Respondents Prayer: The writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Mandamus, forbearing the first and second respondents from allowing the third respondent from carryout the work of laying drinking water pipeline and drinking water extension work at Beemanandhal Village, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

http://www.judis.nic.in

M.DHANDAPANI, J.

kas For Petitioners : Ms.V.Susmitha for Mr.C.Prakasam For Respondents : Mr.J.Ramesh, AGP

O R D E R

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, the learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the relief sought for in this writ petition has become infructuous. She has also made an endorsement to that effect in the bundle.

2.In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner and also in view of the endorsement made, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

06.06.2019 kas To

1. The Block Development Officer, (Regular), Chengam Panchayat Union, Chengam, Thiruvannamalai District.

2. The President, Beemanandhal Panchayat, Beemanandhal, Chengam Taluk, Thiruvannamalai District.

W.P.No.22443 of 2009 and M.P.No.1 of 2009 http://www.judis.nic.in