Pattuammal v. Vannankulam Village Harijan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 02.03.2022
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R. HEMALATHA S.A.Nos.992, 989 to 991 of 2005 and C.M.P.No.13656 of 2005 Pattuammal ...Appellant in all S.As Vs.
Vannankulam Village Harijan Community people Rep. by 1.Kannaiyan 2.Parasuraman 3.Kuppan 4.District Collector, Thiruvannamalai District.
5.The Tahsildar, Tahsildar Officer, Arani.
6.Radha 7.Rukuammal 8.Raniammal 9.Chinthamani Ammal ...Respondents in S.A.Nos.992 & 989 of 2005 1.Kannaiyan 2.Parasuraman 3.Kuppan ...Respondents in S.A.Nos.990 & 991 of 2005 Prayer in S.A.No.992 of 2005: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 05.01.2005 passed in A.S. No.47 of 2003, on the file of the Sub Court, Arani, upholding the decree and judgment dated 06.12.2001 passed in O.S. No.95 of 1997, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Arani, Thiruvannamalai.
Prayer in S.A.No.989 of 2005 : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 05.01.2005 passed in A.S. No.13 of 2002, on the file of the Sub Court, Arani, reversing the decree and judgment dated 06.12.2001 passed in O.S. No.95 of 1997, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Arani, Thiruvannamalai.
Prayer in S.A.No.990 of 2005 : Second Appeal filed under Section
100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 05.01.2005 passed in A.S. No.14 of 2002, on the file of the Sub Court, Arani, Thiruvannamalai District, reversing the decree and judgment dated 06.12.2001 passed in O.S. No.111 of 1997, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Arani. Prayer in S.A.No.991 of 2005 : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 05.01.2005 passed in A.S. No.11 of 2002, on the file of the Sub Court, Arani, Thiruvannamalai District, upholding the decree and judgment dated 06.12.2001 passed in O.S. No.111 of 1997, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Arani. In all S.As:
For Appellant : Mr.P.G.Padmanabhan For R1 to R3 : Mr.V.Raghavachari For R4 to R5 : Ms.E.Indumathi Government Advocate COMMON JUDGMENT When the second appeals came up for hearing on 01.03.2022, there was no representation for the appellant and hence was directed to be posted under the caption 'for dismissal' on 02.03.2022. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing the learned counsel for the appellant reports no instructions for the appellant.
2. In view of the same, the Second Appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mtl To
1. The Subordinate Judge, Arani, Thiruvannamalai District.
2. The Principal District Munsif, Arani, Tiruvannamalai District.
3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras.
+1cc to the Special Government Pleader, S.R.No.14445 S.A.Nos. 992, 989 to 991 of 2005 and C.M.P.No.13656 of 2005 RLD(CO) RGA(27/05/2022)