Madras High CourtWP/25036/2004dismissed

A.C.Jayamalini v. The State Of Tamilnadu, Rep.By

2019-02-27Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS

DATED: 27.02.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH WP.No.25036 of 2004 and WP.MP.No.30435 of 2004

1. A.C.Jayamalini

2. N.Raja

3. A.Senthil

4. P.Saravanan

5. J.Sujatha

6. S.Arul Prakash

7. K.Revathi

8. G.Parimala

9. P.Indira

10. P.Hemalatha

11. P.Selvakumari

12. P.Elumalai

13. M.Umamaheswari

14. L.Maryprabha

15. N.Sivakumar

16. P.Suresh

17. V.Dharaninathan

18. C.Sandhya

19. M.Rashiya Begum

20. E.Karunanidhi

21. M.Ozeer Bee

...Petitioners

1. The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by the Secretary to Government, Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600009.

2. The Director, Teachers Education Research and Training, Chennai - 600006.

3. The Director, Department of Elementary Education, College Road, Chennai - 600006.

4. The Chief Educational Officer, Tiruvallur District.

5. The Chief Educational Officer, Tiruvannamalai District.

6. The Chief Educational Officer, Kancheepuram District.

7. The Chief Educational Officer, Vellore District.

8. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tiruvallur District.

9. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Tiruvannamalai District.

10. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Kancheepuram District.

11. The District Elementary Educational Officer, Vellore District.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a Writ of Declaration that the Diploma in Teachers Education (DTE) issued by the Bharatiya Shiksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh to the petitioner do not require evaluation in the State of Tamil Nadu and to direct the respondents not to insist on the petitioners having their respective certificates evaluated.

For Petitioners : Mrs.A.L.Ganthimathi For Respondents : Mrs.K.Bhuvaneswari, AGP

O R D E R

The prayer in the present Writ Petition is for a declaration that the Diploma in Teacher Education issued by the Bharatiya Shiksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh, does not require evaluation in the state of Tamil Nadu.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that they do not have any instruction from the petitioners.

3. The petitioners herein have applied for the post of Secondary Grade Teacher (Junior Grade) on the strength of the certificates issued by the Bhartiya Shiksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh. It is seen from the counter affidavit filed by the 2nd respondent that the Bhartiya Shiksha Parishad, Lukcnow, has never been granted any recognition for any teacher training course by NRC, NCTE, Jaipur. As such, the diploma certificate obtained by the petitioners herein from an institute claimed to be affiliated to Bhartiya Shiksha Parishad, Uttar Pradesh, cannot be evaluated as equivalent to that of the Teacher Education Certificate. Hence, the petitioners are not liable to be appointed for the post of Secondary Grade Teachers.

4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands dismissed. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-VI) //True Copy// hvk Sub Assistant Registrar To

1. The Secretary to Government, Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600009.