Sivapragasam v. State Rep By Its Deputy Superintendent Of Police,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 29.01.2025
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA Sivapragasam ... Petitioner Vs.
The State represented by, Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Tiruvannamalai District.
(Crime No.03 of 2025).
... Respondent PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, pleased to enlarge the petitioner on bail, in connection with Crime No.03 of 2025, pending investigation on the file of the respondent Police.
For Petitioner :
Mr.T.Shanmugam For Respondent :
Mr.Leonard Arul Joseph Selvam Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
O R D E R
Petition seeking bail in respect of Crime No.03 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 7 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 as amended by the Prevention of Corruption (Amendment) Act, 2018 is on board for consideration.
1/5
2. The incarceration of the petitioner being from 13.01.2025 pleading innocence on the part of the petitioner and false implication in the case, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks indulgence of this Court. He further submits that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this court.
3. The case of the prosecution as putforth by the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police, opposing for grant of bail, is that the petitioner, who was working as a Foreman in the Electricity Department demanded bribe of Rs.6,000/- for giving electricity connection, based on the complaint, a case was registered and trap was laid and the petitioner was arrested. He further submit that the major part of the investigation is over.
4. Further, having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) for the respondent Police and perused the materials available on record, this court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner with certain conditions and accordingly, he is ordered to be released on bail on his executing a bond for a sum of Rs.15,000/- (Rupees Fifteen Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the learned 2/5
Court of Special Judge Cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai and on further conditions that:
[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;
[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30.a.m.,, until further orders. [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;
[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];
3/5
[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 29.01.2025 Sma To
1. Special Judge cum Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tiruvannamalai 2.Deputy Superintendent of Police, Vigilance and Anti Corruption Wing, Tiruvannamalai District.
3. The Superintendent, Central Prison, Vellore.
4. The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.
4/5
A.D.JAGADISH CHANDIRA.,J.
Sma 29.01.2025 5/5