S.Jayabalan, 63 Yrs v. T.Sabitha Ias

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 14.03.2023 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD Contempt Petition No.1352 of 2015

1. S. Jayabalan

2. B. Balasubramaniam

3. C. Ramasamy

4. P. Mani

5. K.Subramanian

6. B. Suriyakala

7. S. Navaneetham

8. S. Vaithiyalingam

9. R. Nurjahan Rahim

10. K. Susila

11. S. Fathima

12. S. Devanathan

13. G. Vaijayanthimala

14. L. Kaliyamoorthy

15. A. Subramanian

16. R. Sundaram

17. K. Elayalwar

18. A. Subramanian ... Petitioners Vs.

T. Sabitha, I.A.S., Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu School Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai 600 009.

... Respondent Page No.1 of 4

Contempt Petition filed under Section 11 of Contempt Act, 1971, praying to punish the respondent for willful disobedience of the order dated 24.04.2012 passed in W.P.No.11006 of 2012.

For Petitioners :

Mr.K.Thennan For Respondent :

Mr.S.Ravikumar, Special Government Pleader

O R D E R

The present Contempt Petition has been filed by the petitioner alleging non-compliance of the order of this Court passed in W.P.No.11006 of 2012 dated 24.04.2012.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent.

3. Today, when the Contempt Petition is taken up for consideration, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondent submitted that the above said order of this Court had been complied with by the respondent herein. In proof of which, a copy of the proceedings letter No.8922/Ni.Va.2(2)/2017 dated 03.07.2017 passed by the Page No.2 of 4

respondent/Secretary to Government of Tamil Nadu, School Education Department, Chennai has been produced before this Court after duly serving it on the learned counsel for the petitioners. This Court had also gone through the same.

4. Since the said order of this Court had been complied with by the respondent, nothing further survives for consideration in this Contempt Petition, which is accordingly closed. It is open to the petitioners to challenge the above order and seek necessary relief, if they are so advised, in the manner known to law.

14.03.2023 (5/6) dpq Index :

Yes/No Speaking Order :

Yes/No J. SATHYA NARAYANA PRASAD, J.

Page No.3 of 4

dpq (5/6) 14.03.2023 Page No.4 of 4