C.Ganesan v. K.Velazhagan

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated 03.11.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE D.KRISHNAKUMAR and THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL W.P. Nos.23329 to 23331 of 2009 and MP.Nos.1, 1 & 1 of 2009 C.Ganesan .. Petitioner in all W.P.Nos.

Versus

1.K.Velazhagan .. 1st respondent in W.P.No.23329/2009 1.J.Sundara Raman .. 1st respondent in W.P.No.23330/2009 1.M.Senthilkumar .. 1st respondent in W.P.No.23331/2009 2.The Union of India Rep.by the Secretary to Government Revenue Department Govt. of Union Territory of Puducherry Puducherry.

3.The Additional Secretary to Government (Revenue) Cum-Collector, Pondicherry.

4.Central Administrative Tribunal Rep.by its Registrar Page No.1 / 6

Madras.

5.S.Damodharan 6.M.Mathew Francis 7.M.Senthilkumar 8.A.Sivasankaran 9.T.Balamurugan 10.K.P.Sreejith 11.K.Manikandan 12.P.Kumaran 13.G.Sathyanarayanan 14.P.P.Shaiju 15.P.V.Manikandan Namboothiri 16.B.Maguesh 17.N.Coumar 18.S.Jaisankar 19.Manoj Valavil 20.A.Aravindan 21.C.Velmourougane 22.G.Sambath 23.J.Chandran 24.K.Thenmozhi 25.K.Ilambirai 26.S.Praveena 27.L.Comala 28.S.Jeyachandran 29.D.Rubala 30.U.Segar 31.S.Thadayuthabani 32.P.Rajendran 33.G.Sivasankar 34.V.Segar 35.R.Vattingame 36.A.Mourougayan 37.R.Susithra 38.C.Premchandar Page No.2 / 6

39.A.Sivasubramanian 40.O.Jawagar 41.V.Arunprasad 42.S.Sudakaran 43.Ilangovan 44.J.Natarajan 45.M.Arun 46.T.P.Shyith 47.M.Vijayalakshmi 48.N.Rajan 49.P.Manimaran 50.K.P.Beena .. Respondents 2 to 50 in all the WPs.

COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking to issue a Writ of Certiorari, Calling for the records relating to O.A.Nos.374 to 376 of 2007 respectively dated 14.07.2009 passed by the fourth respondent and quash the same. For petitioner in all W.Ps.

: M/s.R.Meenal For respondents in all W.Ps.

: Mr.T.Saikrishnan for R1 Mr.R.Syed Mustafa, for R2 & R3 Special Government Pleader R4- Tribunal R5 to R50 -given up Page No.3 / 6

COMMON ORDER (The Order of the Court was made by D.KRISHNAKUMAR, J) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner reported no instructions from the petitioner.

2. In view of the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter, these Writ Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petitions are closed. [D.K.K., J] [P.D.B., J] 03.11.2023 Speaking order: Yes/No Index : Yes/No pvs Page No.4 / 6

To 1.The Secretary to Government Revenue Department Govt. of Union Territory of Puducherry Puducherry.

2.The Additional Secretary to Government (Revenue) Cum-Collector, Pondicherry.

3.The Registrar Madras.

Page No.5 / 6

D.KRISHNAKUMAR , J.

and P.DHANABAL , J.

pvs W.P. Nos.23329 to 23331 of 2009 and MP.Nos.1, 1 & 1 of 2009 03.11.2023 Page No.6 / 6