← Library
Madras High CourtHCP/3073/2015allowed

Muniyammal v. The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep By

2016-04-07Honourable Mr Justice S. Nagamuthu,Honourable Mr Justice M. Jaichandren3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 07.04.2016

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE M.JAICHANDREN and THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU H.C.P.No.3073 of 2015 Muniyammal ... Petitioner Vs

1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep. by its Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007 ... Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS to call for the entire records relating to the impugned order in No.BCDFGISSSV.No.1137/2015 dated 30.10.2015 on the file of the second respondent herein and set aside the same as illegal and consequently, direct the respondents herein to produce the detenu Pattu @ Parthiban, son of Aladiyan, aged about 23 years, now confined at Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, before this Court and set him at liberty.

For Petitioner :

Mr.Ilayaraja Kandasamy For Respondents :

Mr.A.N.Thambidurai, Additional Public Prosecutor

ORDER

[Order of the Court was made by M.JAICHANDREN,J] This Habeas Corpus Petition is filed, by the mother of the detenu, namely, Pattu @ Parthiban, son of Aladiyan, aged 23 years, to issue a Writ of Habeas Corpus, to call for the records, in Proceedings No.BCDFGISSSV.No.1137/2015, dated 30.10.2015, passed by the 2nd Respondent, detaining the detenu, under Section 3(1) of the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 (Tamil Nadu Act 14/1982), the Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982, branding him as a "Goonda", in the Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai, and to quash the same and to direct the Respondents to produce the body of the detenu and set him at liberty forthwith.

2. We have heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the State and we have also perused the records carefully.

3. Though, several grounds have been raised in this Habeas Corpus Petition, Mr.Ilayaraja Kandasamy, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, had assailed the impugned detention order mainly on the ground that the detaining authority had stated, in Paragraph No.4 of the order of detention, that no bail application had been moved on behalf of the detenu, in F3, Nungambakkam Police Station Crime Nos.1376 and 1378 of 2015. However, in the detention order, it had been stated that the relatives of the detenu are taking action to take him out on bail, in F3, Nungambakkam Police Station Crime Nos.1376 and 1378 of 2015, by filing bail applications before the appropriate Court. It had also been pointed out that no statements had been recorded from the relatives of the detenu with regard to the claim that they are taking steps to move bail application, on behalf of the detenu and no such statements had been furnished to the detenu.

4. The said submissions made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, had not been refuted by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor.

5. It is noted from the records available that no statements had been recorded from the relatives concerned to substantiate the claim that they are taking steps to move bail applications on behalf of the detenu, to take him out on bail, in the above said cases. In such circumstances, we find that

there is non-application of mind on the part of the detaining authority, in passing the detention order. Therefore, we are inclined to set aside the detention order.

6.Accordingly, the Habeas Corpus Petition is allowed and the impugned detention order, dated 30.10.2015, passed by the second respondent is set aside. The detenu is directed to be released forthwith unless his presence is required in connection with any other case.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar tsi To

1. The Secretary to Government Home, Prohibition and Excise Department Fort St.George Chennai 600 009.

2. The Commissioner of Police, Greater Chennai Police, Vepery, Chennai-600 007.

3. The Superintendent of Police, Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai.

4. The Joint Secretary to Government, Public(Law & Order), Fort Saint George, Chennai - 9.

5. The Additional Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

H.C.P.No.3073 of 2015 KS(CO) CA(28/04/2016)