J.Yocop v. The State Rep By Its,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

Dated : 11.02.2021 CORAM :

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. BHARATHIDASAN Crl.O.P.No.2304 of 2021 J.Yacop ... Petitioner Vs.

The State Rep. by ... Respondent The Inspector of Police, T-14, Mangadu Police Station Kancheepuram District.

Crime No.Not Known of 2021 PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 438 of Criminal Procedure Code to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.Not Known of 2021 pending investigation on the file of the Respondent.

For Petitioner : Mr.R.Sasi Kumar For Respondent : Mr.S.Karthikeyan Addl. Public Prosecutor

ORDER

(The case has been heard through video conference) The petitioner apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 506(ii) of I.P.C., in Crime No. not known of 2021, on the file of the respondent police, and now, he has filed this petition seeking to grant anticipatory bail.

2. The defacto complainant is the wife of sister's husband. The case of the prosecution is that due to a family dispute, the defacto complainant has assaulted his wife, which was questioned by the petitioner, as a result of which, there was a wordy quarrel between them. In the said circumstances, the criminal case has been registered against the petitioner. Now apprehending arrest, the present petition has been filed by the petitioner.

3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that he is an innocent person and he is no way connected with the offence. He would submit that he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondent submitted that due to a family dispute, the defacto complainant has assaulted his wife, which was questioned by the petitioner, as a result of which, there was a wordy quarrel between them. He would submit that there is no previous case pending against the petitioner. However, he opposed to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Taking into consideration the fact that due to a family dispute, on the date of occurrence, there was a wordy quarrel between the parties, there is no previous case pending against the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner, subject to the following conditions: a) Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail, in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Sriperumbudhur on condition that the petitioner shall execute a separate bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties, for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned, and on further condition that:

[b] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[c] the petitioner shall appear before the respondent police as and when required for interrogation; [d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[f] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioners in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 229A IPC.

6. With the above directions, this Criminal Original Petition is ordered.

-sd/- 11/02/2021 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE DISTRICIT MUNSIF CUM JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, SRIPERUMBUDUR.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, CHENGALPET [FOR INFORMATION].

3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, T-14 MANGADU POLICE STATION, KANCHEEPURAM DISTRICT +1 CC to M/S.R.SASIKUMAR Advocate on payment of necessary charges SR NO. 1460 CRL OP.2304/2021 Date :11/02/2021 MN-18/02/2021