A.Abdul Samad v. The Deputy Inspector General

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.11.2019 CORAM :

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. DURAISWAMY W.P. No.29345 of 2004 A.Abdul Samad ... Petitioner Vs.

1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Thirunelveli Range, Thirunelveli.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Technical Services, Chennai - 600 004.

... Respondents Prayer : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of a writ of declaration declaring that the suspension order passed by the first respondent in Ref.No.C.No.C1/4994/2002 ROO 85/2002 dated 04.04.2002 as illegal null and void and consequently direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner in service with immediate effect and pay the arrears of salary from 24.04.2002 to till date treating the suspension period as duty. For Petitioner : Mr.S.Selvathirumurugan For Respondents : Mr.R.Suresh Kumar Government Advocate

O R D E R

Today, when the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the relief sought for in the writ petition has become infructuous for the https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

reason that the petitioner was dismissed from service. The learned counsel also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS VIII) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar To 1.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Thirunelveli Range, Thirunelveli.

2.The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Technical Services, Chennai - 600 004.

+1cc to the Government Pleader Sr.100422 W.P. No.29345 of 2004 bp[co] srg 08/01/2020 https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/