Raju v. State Rep.By

Crl.M.P.No.2041 of 2024 in Crl.A.No.1054 of 2023 S.M.SUBRAMANIAM, J.

AND A.D.MARIA CLETE , J.

The petition for suspension of sentence is examined with reference to the evidences of PW1, PW2 and PW3, who are the eye witnesses. PW2 turned hostile. PW1 is the son of the deceased and PW3 is the daughter of the deceased. Both were present at the scene of occurrence. The evidences of PW1 and PW3 are corroborative. We have gone through the medical evidences of PW12/Doctor, who conducted postmortem examination. 12 external injuries are identified. We have not found any prima facie case in favour of the petitioner for granting of suspension of sentence.

2.

Consequently, the Criminal Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. List Crl.A.No.1054 of 2023 after two weeks.

(S.M.S., J.) (A.D.M.C., J.) 26.09.2024 gd https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis