← Library
Madras High CourtWP/29613/2004dismissed as infructuous

The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Deputy Inspector General Of

2019-09-20Honourable Mr Justice V. Bharathidasan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED :20.09.2019

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE V.BHARATHIDASAN W.P.Nos. 29613 & 29614 of 2004 and WPMP.No.35976 of 2004 & 35977 of 2004 The New India Assurance Co.Ltd, Kumaran Shopping Complex, Kumaran Road, Tiruppur ... Petitioner in both W.Ps.

vs.

1. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch-CID, Chennai - 600 002.

2. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Coimbatore Range.

3. Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Coimbatore District.

4. Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Coimbatore.

5. Angammal

6. K. Balasubramaniam

7. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Addl. District Court, Fast Track Court No.4, Coimbatore at Tiruppur. ... Respondents in W.P.No.29613/2004.

1. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Crime Branch-CID, Chennai - 600 002.

2. Deputy Inspector General of Police, Coimbatore Range.

3. Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Coimbatore District.

4. Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Coimbatore.

5. Chinnamuthu

6. K. Balasubramaniam

7. Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Addl. District Court, Fast Track Court No.4, Coimbatore at Tiruppur. ... Respondents in W.P.No.29614/2004 COMMON PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, directing the respondents 1 to 4 herein to forthwith take action on the complaint dated 19.03.2004 sent by the petitioner herein and in terms of RC.No.C-6/172/5136/2004 dated 31.03.2004 of the 1st respondent herein.

For Petitioner :

Mr. N.Vijayaraghavan [in both W.Ps.] For Respondents:

Mr.G.Suryanarayanan, [in both W.Ps.] Government Advocate for R1 to R4

ORDER

(Order of the Court was made by Mr.V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.) The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the relief sought for in these writ petitions have become infructuous and hence the writ petitions may be dismissed as infructuous.

2. Recording the submissions made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner nothing survives for adjudication in these writ petitions. Hence, these writ petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar mp

To 1.The Deputy Inspector General of police, Crime Branch, CID, Chennai-600 002.

2.The Deputy Inspector Genral of Police, Coimbatore Range.

3.The Superintendent of Police, District Crime Branch, Coimbatore District.

4.The Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Coimbatore.

CC:The Additional District Judge (MACT) FTC.4, Coimbatore at Tirupur.

+2cc to Mr.N.Vijayaraghavan, Advocate SR.81642,81643 +1cc to the Government Pleader SR.81598 W.P.No. 29613 & 29614 of 2004 and WPMP.No.35976 of 2004 & 35977 of 2004 RSK(CO) CB(30/10/2019)