R.Durairaj v. State Of Tamil Nadu

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED 05.02.2019

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.RAJA Writ Petition No.29392 of 2008 and M.P. No.1 of 2008 R.Durairaj .. Petitioner

Versus

1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Environment & Forests Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2.Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Chennai-6.

.. Respondents Prayer: Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to regularise the services of the petitioner either as Forest Watcher or as Bungalow Watcher in the regular time scale of pay from the date on which his junior was regularised and confer all the consequential benefits.

For Petitioner :

Mr.P.Ganesan For Respondents:

Mrs.Thangavadhana Balakrishnan Additional Government Pleader

O R D E R

When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the prayer in the writ petition has become infructuous.

2.In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, connected M.P. is closed. No costs. Sd/- Deputy Registrar(CS) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vga https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

To 1.State of Tamil Nadu, rep. by its Secretary to Government, Environment & Forests Department, Secretariat, Chennai-9.

2.Principal Chief Conservator of Forests, Chennai-6.

+1 CC TO GOVERNMENT PLEADER SR.NO. 10305 Writ Petition No.29392 of 2008 and M.P. No.1 of 2008 A.SK(22/02/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/