B.S. Mahesh v. The State Rep.By Its, The Inspector Of Police,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 31.01.2025

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNDAR MOHAN Crl.O.P.No.2312 of 2025 B.S.Mahesh ... Petitioner / Accused Vs.

The State Rep. by The Inspector of Police, Arakkonam Taluk Police Station, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipet District.

(Crime No.274 of 2024) ... Respondent/Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in Crime No.274 of 2024 on the file of the respondent Police. For Petitioner :

Mr.M.Devaraj For Respondent :

Mr.S.Santhosh Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent 1/6

police for the offences punishable under Sections 296(2), 115(2), 118(1) & 351(3) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 in Crime No.274 of 2024 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 28.07.2024, there was a wordy quarrel with respect to usage of a common toilet between the petitioner and the parents of the defacto complainant. When the defacto complainant questioned the same, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant with knife and also abused him in filthy language. As a result, the defacto complainant was suffered with injuries and admitted to the hospital. Hence, the case. 3.The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that the petitioner is a law abiding citizen and ready to abide by any stringent condition that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he prays for grant of bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for the respondent would submit that there was a wordy quarrel between the petitioner and the 2/6

parents of the defacto complainant. When the defacto complainant questioned the same, the petitioner attacked the defacto complainant with knife and also abused him in filthy language. He would further submit that there are no previous cases pending as against the petitioner and the injured had been discharged from the hospital.

5. Heard both side learned counsel and perused the materials available on record.

6. Considering the nature of allegation; the fact that the injured had been discharged from the hospital; and since custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy was made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate - I, Arakkonam, Ranipet District, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only), 3/6

with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that:

[a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders;

[c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 4/6

31.01.2025 smv To 1.The Judicial Magistrate-I, Arakkonam, Ranipet District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Arakkonam Taluk Police Station, Arakkonam Taluk, Ranipet District.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras.

5/6

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

smv Crl.O.P.No.2312 of 2025 31.01.2025 6/6