← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/2093/2025granted

Rajesh v. State Rep By

2025-02-06Honourable Mr Justice Sunder Mohan6 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 06.02.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE SUNDER MOHAN Rajesh ... Petitioner Vs.

State rep by Inspector of Police, Olakkur Police Station, Villupuram District.

... Respondent Crime No.21 of 2025 Prayer: Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest in the above crime no. 21 of 2025 on the file of respondent Police. For petitioner : M/s.S.Kamala Kanth For Respondent : Mr.S.Balaji, Government Advocate (Crl.Side)

O R D E R

The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 326(G) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No.21 of 2025, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that, when the defacto complainant Page No.1 of 6

and other family members were not at home, the petitioner is stated to have poured petrol and set fire to the front portion of the house. Hence, the case.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated in this case. He would further submit that, even in the FIR the alleged offence is said to have been committed by two unknown persons and since there is some matrimonial dispute, the petitioner was arrayed as an accused; and that ini any case the custodial interrogation is not required for the purpose of investigation. Therefore, he prayed for the grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4. Learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police per contra submitted the petitioner, with the history of bad antecedent, is said to have committed the offence and that three previous cases were pending against the petitioner. Therefore, he opposed for granting bail to the petitioner.

5.Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Government Advocate (Crl.side) for the respondent and perused the Page No.2 of 6

materials available on record.

6. Considering the nature of allegations; and the petitioner and the defacto complainant are close relatives; that previous cases were registered in 2021, 2022 and 2024 respectively; and that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required for the purpose of investigation, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions.

7. Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen (15) days from the date on which the order copy is made ready, before the learned Judicial Magistrate No.I, Court at Tindivanam, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the said Magistrate, on further condition that: [a] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb Impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhar card or Page No.3 of 6

Bank pass Book to ensure their identity;

[b] the petitioner shall report before the respondent Police, everyday at 10.30 a.m., until further orders; [c] the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

[d] the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; [e] On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala reported in [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

[f] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S 06.02.2025 Index : Yes/No Page No.4 of 6

Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order Internet: Yes/No dpa To 1.The Judicial Magistrate No.I Court Tindivanam

2. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai.

3. The Inspector of Police, Olakkur Police Station, Villupuram District.

SUNDER MOHAN, J.

dpa Page No.5 of 6

06.02.2025 Page No.6 of 6