Madras High CourtWP/10675/2021disposed of

V.G.P.Rajadas v. The Commissioner Of Police

2021-04-28Honourable Mr Justice M. Nirmal Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED : 28.04.2021

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.NIRMAL KUMAR W.P.No.10675 of 2021 V.G.P.Rajadas, S/o.V.G.Panneerdas, Director, V.G.P.Housing Private Limited, V.G.P. Square, No.6, Dharmaraja Kovil Street, Saidapet, Chennai-600 015. ... Petitioner

Versus

1.The Commissioner of Police, The Greater Chennai City, Chennai.

2.The Inspector of Police, J1-Saidapet Police Station (Crime), Saidapet, Chennai.

3.Raja ... Respondents PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a Writ or Order direction in the nature of Writ of Mandamus directing the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute in order to extend help to the respondent No.3 and giving threats to the petitioner to hand over the vacant possession of the property on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 13.01.2021. For Petitioner :Dr.E.Gomathi For R1 & R2 :Mr.C.Raghavan, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) *****

ORDER

This Criminal Original Petition has been filed to direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere with the civil dispute in order to extend help to the 3rd respondent and giving threats to the petitioner to hand over the vacant possession of the property on the basis of the petitioner's representation dated 13.01.2021. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

2.The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that based on the complaint given by the 3rd respondent, the 2nd respondent is unnecessarily harassing the petitioner. 3.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. Side) submitted that since the 3rd respondent has lodged a complaint against the petitioner and only for enquiry purpose in the said complaint, he was called and he was not subject to any harassment. 4.If the complaint discloses any cognizable offence, the 2nd respondent has to register a case. In case, the said complaint does not disclose any cognizable offence, the 2nd respondent can conduct preliminary enquiry with the complainant and if the said enquiry reveals any cognizable offence, he can register a case and proceed further in accordance with law. Instead of that he should not unnecessarily harass the petitioner. 5.With the aforesaid directions, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No Costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS-III) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar vv2 To 1.The Commissioner of Police, The Greater Chennai City, Chennai.

2.The Inspector of Police, J1-Saidapet Police Station (Crime), Saidapet, Chennai.

3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.

W.P.No.10675 of 2021 SS(CO) CB(12/07/2021) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/