V.Vinayagamurthy v. The District Collector

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

DATED: 29.04.2019

CORAM:

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE T.RAJA W.P.No.25762 of 2009 V.Vinayagamurthy .. Petitioner Vs 1.The Director Collector, Chennai District.

2.The Personal Assistant (General) to District Collector, Chennai.

3.The Tahsildar, Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, K.K.Nagar, Chennai - 78.

.. Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of certiorari to call for the records of the second respondent made in No.A4/5551/2009, dated 19.02.2009 and quash the same.

For Petitioner : No Appearance For Respondents : Mr.K.Ravikumar, AGP

ORDER

Challenging the correctness of the impugned suspension order passed by the second respondent, the petitioner has filed this writ petition.

2. When the matter is taken up, learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents produced a copy of the letter dated 29.04.2019 of the first respondent, whereby it is stated that the suspension of the petitioner was revoked and thereafter, he was also posted in a non-sensitive post. The said letter of the first respondent is recorded. https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/

3. As the petitioner was reinstated in service, nothing survives for further adjudication in this matter. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No Costs.

Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CO) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar rkm To 1.The Director Collector, Chennai District.

2.The Personal Assistant (General) to District Collector, Chennai.

3.The Tahsildar, Mambalam-Guindy Taluk, K.K.Nagar, Chennai - 78.

+1cc to the Government Pleader, S.R.No.43144 W.P.No.25762 of 2009 AD(CO) RRS(17/06/2019) https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/