← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP/3033/2022granted

Basker v. State By

2022-02-09Honourable Mr Justice R. Pongiappan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS

( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Wednesday, the Ninth day of February Two Thousand Twenty Two PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr Justice R. PONGIAPPAN CRIMINAL ORIGINAL PETITION No.3033 of 2022 BASKER [ PETITIONER / ACCUSED ] Vs STATE BY [ RESPONDENT ] THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ROYAKOTTAI POLICE STATION, KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

(CRIME NO.22 OF 2022) For Petitioner : M/S.M.JAYACHANDRAN Advocate For Respondent : MR.S.SANTHOSH, Govt. Advocate ( Crl. Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec. 438 Cr.P.C. ORDER : The Court Made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehend arrest for the alleged offences under sections 294(b), 323, 506(i) of IPC in Crime No.22 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seek anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that there was a previous enmity between the petitioner and defacto complainant with regard to the money dispute, due to which, the petitioner abused and assaulted the defacto complainant. Hence the complaint was registered by the Law Enforcing Agency.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent persons and he has not committed any such offences as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that he has been falsely implicated in this case. Hence, he prays for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) appearing for the respondent submits that the injured persons discharged from the hospital. However, he opposed grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

5. Heard both sides.

6. Considering the fact that the injured person discharged from the hospital, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, within a period of fifteen days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, before the learned Judicial Magistrate, Denkanikottai, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only), with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or the police officer who intends to arrest or to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned and on further condition that: (a) the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.30 a.m., for a period of fifteen days and thereafter as and when required for interrogation. (b)the petitioner shall not tamper with evidence or witness either during investigation or trial; (c)the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial;

(d) On breach of the any aforesaid conditions, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled and the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)AIR SCW 5560];

-sd/- 09/02/2022 This order, on being produced, be punctually observed and carried into execution by all concerned TRUE COPY Sub-Assistant Registrar (Statistics/C.S.) High Court, Madras - 600 104.

TO 1 THE JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, DENKANIKOTTAI, KRISHNAGIRI.

2 THE CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE KRISHNAGIRI. [FOR INFORMATION] 3 THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT, MADRAS.

4 THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ROYAKOTTAI POLICE STATION KRISHNAGIRI DISTRICT.

CC to M/S.M.JAYACHANDRAN Advocate on payment of necessary charges CRL OP.3033/2022 Date :09/02/2022 TA-15/02/2022