A.Arun Raj v. State Represented By

V. BHARATHIDASAN. J., (The case has been heard through video conference) This matter is taken up for hearing under the caption "For Being Mentioned" today, at the instance of the learned counsel for the petitioner.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that earlier, this Court, by an order dated 17.02.2021 granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In which, the name of the petitioner has been wrongly mentioned as "A.Arun" instead of "A.Arun Raj" in the cause title.

3. The learned counsel also pointed out that, in paragraph No.2 of the said order, it has been mentioned as "the daughter of the defacto complainant and the petitioner were husband and wife" instead of "the daughter of the defacto complainant and the petitioner's brother were husband and wife".

4. Considering the above submission, the following correction is ordered to be carried out in the order dated 17.02.2021 passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.2191 of 2021:- (i) the name of the petitioner mentioned in the cause title is ordered to be read as "A.Arun Raj" ;

(ii) the paragraph 2 is ordered to be read as under: 1/3

" 2. The case of the prosecution is that the daughter of the defacto complainant and the petitioner's brother were husband and wife and there was a family dispute between them. In connection with the said dispute, on 01.02.2021, the petitioner abused and obstructed the auto, in which, the defacto complainant was travelling. Hence, the respondent police registered a case against the petitioner."

5. Time to execute sureties, is extended for a further period of two weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

6. Registry is directed to carry out the above correction in the order dated 17.02.2021 passed by this Court in Crl.O.P.No.2191 of 2021 and issue fresh copy of the order to the parties, forthwith. 04.03.2021 mrp 2/3

V.BHARATHIDASAN, J.

mrp 04.03.2021 3/3