← Library
Madras High CourtWP/31642/2004dismissed

Vatsala v. The Presiding Officer,The

2019-04-25Honourable Mr Justice M.S. Ramesh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF MADRAS

DATED: 25.04.2019

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH W.P.No.31642 of 2004 Vatsala

...Petitioner

Vs

1. The Presiding Officer, The Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Shastri Bhavan, Chennai - 600006.

2. Indian Bank rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, 31, Rajaji Slai, Chennai - 1.

3. Banking Service Recruitment Board, Rep. by its Secretary, Chennai - 6.

4. The Government of India Rep. by its Secretary, Ministry of Finance, (Department of Economic Affairs) Banking Division, Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, New Delhi - 110001.

5. Indian Overseas Bank rep. by its Chairman and Managing Director, 762, Anna Salai, Chennai - 2.

...Respondents

PRAYER: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus after calling for the records relating to the order dated 30.06.2004 in I.A.No.8 of 2004 in I.D.No.83 of 2002, quash the same and consequently direct the first respondent to implead the respondents 4 and 5 herein as II party/third and fourth respondents in I.D.No.83 of 2002 and award costs.

For Petitioner : Mr.V.Ajay Khose For Respondents: R1 - Court Mrs.Rita Chandrasekar for M/S.Aiyar & Dolia for R2 R3 - Appearance Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao for R4 Mr.V.Govardhanan for Mr.N.G.R.Prasad for R5

O R D E R

The justification adduced by the petitioner for impleading the respondents 4 and 5 herein is beyond the scope of the reference made and the Labour Court has also taken note of this fact and held that the petitioner has not established that the presence of the Indian Overseas Bank or the Ministry of Finance is necessary for complete and effective adjudication.

2. The main relief sought for is as against the respondents 2 and 3 and I do not find any reason as to why the respondents 4 and 5 should be made as party respondents. As such, I do not find any reason to interfere in the orders of the first respondent.

3. Hence, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IV) //True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar hvk To

1. The Presiding Officer, The Central Government Industrial Tribunal cum Labour Court, Shastri Bhavan, Chennai - 600006.

2. Chairman and Managing Director, Indian Bank 31, Rajaji Slai, Chennai - 1.

3. The Secretary, Banking Service Recruitment Board, Chennai - 6.

4. The Secretary, Ministry of Finance, (Department of Economic Affairs) Banking Division, Jeevan Deep Building, Sansad Marg, New Delhi - 110001.

5. Chairman and Managing Director, Indian Overseas Bank, 762, Anna Salai, Chennai - 2.

+1cc to Mr.N.S.R.Prasad , Advocate Sr.40103 +1cc to Mr.J.Madanagopal Rao, Advocate Sr.39582 +1cc to M/S.Aiyar & Dolia, Advocate Sr.40746 W.P.No.31642 of 2004 kk[co] srg 28/06/2019